Ask Questions Later

Ask Questions Later

Share this post

Ask Questions Later
Ask Questions Later
The Straight Story on the Genocide Ruling at The Hague
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

The Straight Story on the Genocide Ruling at The Hague

The International Court of Justice is concerned about Israel's actions - but not enough to order a halt to the fighting in Gaza

Dan Perry's avatar
Dan Perry
Jan 27, 2024
∙ Paid
6

Share this post

Ask Questions Later
Ask Questions Later
The Straight Story on the Genocide Ruling at The Hague
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
4
Share
ICJ President Joan Donoghue (C) speaks at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) prior to the verdict announcement in the genocide case against Israel, brought by South Africa, in The Hague on Janua

There will be a lot of spin about Friday’s ruling at the International Court of Justice on South Africa’s charge that Israel is guilty of genocide in its effort to crush Hamas in Gaza. I’d like to offer a straight take on what actually happened – and what did not.

Israel’s critics will make much hay of the court’s finding that there is a “plausible” case that provisional measures are needed to avoid “irreparable prejudice” to Palestinians’ rights. And yes, for sure, Israel got rapped on the knuckles.

But the main news, for anyone still exercising news judgment,  is that the court did not rule that Israel must end its war effort. Read on.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Ask Questions Later to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Dan Perry
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More